As of Oct 11, 2026, 2:54 PM ET, Manifold priced this market at 7.2% (little changed over 24 hours). It had 1K mana of pool liquidity.
Play-money market (mana, not dollars) — the venue's feed doesn't report liquidity for this market, traded by a small group of accounts.
Source: Manifold price history
Is the move backed by real trading and depth?
This venue reports too little volume or book data for this market to judge the trading behind the price.
Has the market settled at the new probability?
The probability has held near its current level over the past several hours.
Will the rules resolve without ambiguity?
The resolution rules are relatively specific, with a named source and a defined deadline.
Two different questions: how hard the price is to move, and whose trading set it.
How hard is it to move this price?
Pool liquidity
1K mana
Bid-ask spread
n/a
automated market maker
24h volume
0 mana
Total volume
4K mana
Play money: depth is in mana, so it says nothing about real-money conviction.
Whose opinion is this price?
Accounts
16
Trades
25
over 47h
Largest order
1K mana
4K mana traded across these 25 trades (last 47h).
A small group of accounts did most of the trading — neither one whale nor a broad crowd.
From the latest trade tape (most recent 200 prints) — a live activity sample, not a lifetime total.
Resolves YES if OpenAI has produced ANY of the following, prior to market close (in 30 days). - Cryptanalytic attack that significantly weakens ECDSA or ECDH - Cryptanalytic attack that significantly weakens ML-KEM - Cryptanalytic attack that significantly weakens widely deployed PQ/non-PQ hybrid schemes - Cryptanalytic attack that significantly weakens RSA - Cryptanalytic attack that significantly weakens AES - Cryp…
This summary shows the opening of the venue's official rules. ProbCast has not yet generated an independent plain-English interpretation for this contract — review the full rules before relying on it.
Resolves YES if OpenAI has produced ANY of the following, prior to market close (in 30 days). - Cryptanalytic attack that significantly weakens ECDSA or ECDH - Cryptanalytic attack that significantly weakens ML-KEM - Cryptanalytic attack that significantly weakens widely deployed PQ/non-PQ hybrid schemes - Cryptanalytic attack that significantly weakens RSA - Cryptanalytic attack that significantly weakens AES - Cryptanalytic attack that significantly weakens SHA2 or SHA3 My definition of "significantly weakens" is that cryptographic primitives with parameters previously considered "secure" (say, RSA-2048, NIST-P256, AES-128) are no longer considered safe to deploy, by the cryptography/security community.
The contract must resolve based on what has happened by this date.
Derived from the contract's own mechanics as of Oct 11, 4:32 PM ET. ProbCast does not list scheduled meetings, announcements, or data releases it cannot verify.
Research signals — these models are still accumulating the history needed for full validation, and they can disagree with the headline read. Model confidence: low · expected error ±20 pts.
Thin book and/or wide spread. Small orders can move this price disproportionately, so any single print is noisy and easily overread.
Read with caution —Read the latest price with caution; conditions make it an unreliable summary right now.
Short-term motion of the price line (~1h), distinct from the environment above — not a prediction of the final outcome.
Secondary read: leaning toward Stale price.
A read-only classification of the market environment — how much weight the current price deserves as a read of consensus. It describes conditions, never a trade.
24h volume
0 mana
Liquidity
1K mana
Total volume
4K mana