Will the upper bound of the federal funds rate be above 3.00% following the Fed's Sep 16, 2026 meeting?
Too little market data to assess this move — treat the probability with caution.
This venue reports too little volume or book data for this market to judge the trading behind the price.
How credible was the move?
Three separate questions — a move can be genuine while the latest price is still settling. Methodology →
Move validity
Is the move backed by real trading and depth?
Insufficient dataThis venue reports too little volume or book data for this market to judge the trading behind the price.
Consensus stability
Has the market settled at the new probability?
StableThe probability has held near its current level over the past several hours.
Contract clarity
Will the rules resolve without ambiguity?
HighThe resolution rules are relatively specific, with a named source and a defined deadline.
What this market actually measures
If the upper bound of the target federal funds rate published on the Federal Reserve's official website is greater than 3.00% following the Federal Reserve's Sep 16, 2026 meeting, then the market resolves to Yes.
This summary shows the opening of the venue's official rules. ProbCast has not yet generated an independent plain-English interpretation for this contract — review the full rules before relying on it.
View full official resolution rules
If the upper bound of the target federal funds rate published on the Federal Reserve's official website is greater than 3.00% following the Federal Reserve's Sep 16, 2026 meeting, then the market resolves to Yes.
Resolution source: If the upper bound of the target federal funds rate published on the Federal Reserve's off…
What could move this market next?
- The market's deadline arrivesSeptember 16, 2026 at 1:55 PM ET
The contract must resolve based on what has happened by this date.
Derived from the contract's own mechanics as of Sep 15, 1:56 PM ET. ProbCast does not list scheduled meetings, announcements, or data releases it cannot verify.
Advanced analysis (experimental)
Research signals — these models are still accumulating the history needed for full validation, and they can disagree with the headline read. Model confidence: low · expected error ±22 pts.
What's happening
Near resolution or with ambiguous wording, pricing is mechanically thin and can swing on tiny trades. Read end-of-life prices with extra caution.
- Resolves in 1 day(s) — end-of-life pricing is mechanically thin
Read with caution —Read the latest price with caution; conditions make it an unreliable summary right now.
More details — reliability score, dynamics, durability
- Illiquid / quiet99%
- Choppy / mean-reverting1%
Short-term motion of the price line (~1h), distinct from the environment above — not a prediction of the final outcome.
Secondary read: leaning toward Thin market.
A read-only classification of the market environment — how much weight the current price deserves as a read of consensus. It describes conditions, never a trade.
Market data
24h volume
$647.6
Liquidity
$0
Total volume
$10.7K
- Category
- Macro / Fed
- Venue
- Kalshi
- Open interest
- $6.6K
- Spread
- 1.0 pts
- Best bid
- 99.0%
- Best ask
- 100.0%
- 7-day range
- 99.5% – 99.5%
- Resolves
- Sep 16, 2026
- Resolution
- If the upper bound of the target federal funds rate published on the Federal Reserve's off…