Market capacity
How hard is it to move this price?
Pool liquidity
1.1K mana
Bid-ask spread
n/a
automated market maker
24h volume
317 mana
Total volume
0 mana
Play money: depth is in mana, so it says nothing about real-money conviction.
As of Oct 24, 2026, 10:33 PM ET, Manifold priced this market at 69.8% (up from 61.0% 24 hours earlier). It had 317 mana traded in the past 24 hours and 1.1K mana of pool liquidity. probcast.co rates the support behind this price as weak.
Play-money market (mana, not dollars) — thin market where small orders can move the price — but today's move came mostly from one account.
Source: Manifold price history
Is the move backed by real trading and depth?
The pricing has weak support: healthy trading volume and market depth.
Has the market settled at the new probability?
The probability moved another 5.6 points in the past hour — the market is still repricing.
Will the rules resolve without ambiguity?
Moderate resolution risk, driven mainly by no resolution basis.
Two different questions: how hard the price is to move, and whose trading set it.
How hard is it to move this price?
Pool liquidity
1.1K mana
Bid-ask spread
n/a
automated market maker
24h volume
317 mana
Total volume
0 mana
Play money: depth is in mana, so it says nothing about real-money conviction.
Whose opinion is this price?
Accounts
5
Trades
6
over 4h
Largest order
200 mana
317 mana traded across these 6 trades (last 4h).
One account did most of the recent trading — the price reflects that account's view more than a crowd's.
From the latest trade tape (most recent 200 prints) — a live activity sample, not a lifetime total.
The probability rose 8.8 percentage points over the last 24 hours (61.0% → 69.8%).
No verified catalyst has been linked to this move yet. ProbCast does not attribute moves to news without evidence connecting the timing of a specific report to the repricing.
The contract must resolve based on what has happened by this date.
Derived from the contract's own mechanics as of Oct 24, 10:42 PM ET. ProbCast does not list scheduled meetings, announcements, or data releases it cannot verify.
Research signals — these models are still accumulating the history needed for full validation, and they can disagree with the headline read. Model confidence: low · expected error ±27 pts.
The price is actively repricing on real volume. The number is still moving — don't treat the latest print as settled consensus yet.
Read the latest price with caution; conditions make it an unreliable summary right now.
Short-term motion of the price line (~1h), distinct from the environment above — not a prediction of the final outcome.
Secondary read: leaning toward Trending.
A read-only classification of the market environment — how much weight the current price deserves as a read of consensus. It describes conditions, never a trade.