Market capacity
How hard is it to move this price?
Pool liquidity
100 mana
Bid-ask spread
n/a
automated market maker
24h volume
20 mana
Total volume
288.2 mana
Play money: depth is in mana, so it says nothing about real-money conviction.
As of Oct 18, 2026, 9:40 AM ET, Manifold priced this market at 52.5% (up from 42.0% 24 hours earlier). It had 20 mana traded in the past 24 hours and 100 mana of pool liquidity. probcast.co rates the support behind this price as weak.
Play-money market (mana, not dollars) — thin market where small orders can move the price — today's move came from a small group of accounts.
Source: ProbCast snapshots (Manifold)
Is the move backed by real trading and depth?
The pricing has weak support: moderate trading volume.
Has the market settled at the new probability?
Movement has slowed (10.5 points over six hours) but the market has not fully settled.
Will the rules resolve without ambiguity?
The resolution rules are relatively specific, with a named source and a defined deadline.
Two different questions: how hard the price is to move, and whose trading set it.
How hard is it to move this price?
Pool liquidity
100 mana
Bid-ask spread
n/a
automated market maker
24h volume
20 mana
Total volume
288.2 mana
Play money: depth is in mana, so it says nothing about real-money conviction.
Whose opinion is this price?
Accounts
13
Trades
32
over 93 days
Largest order
50 mana
267.6 mana traded across these 32 trades (last 93 days).
A small group of accounts did most of the trading — neither one whale nor a broad crowd.
From the latest trade tape (most recent 200 prints) — a live activity sample, not a lifetime total.
Specifically will I stop thinking it's dumb. My judgement.
This summary shows the opening of the venue's official rules. ProbCast has not yet generated an independent plain-English interpretation for this contract — review the full rules before relying on it.
Specifically will I stop thinking it's dumb. My judgement. Note that it can be very smart and still be dumb. Free tier only. Example of it being dumb and contradicting itself: [image]Also, regarding fiber optic drones, "A system optimized for combat may intentionally allow a lot of slack and avoid applying excessive tension because a snapped cable is preferable to losing the drone." Update 2026-07-20 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator will evaluate the following free tier AI products: ChatGPT, Grok, Gemini, and Perplexity. Update 2026-07-20 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Resolution criteria clarified: Resolves YES if one AI becomes consistently good enough that the creator switches to it for personal use and no longer finds it dumb Resolves NO if all tested AIs are sometimes dumb and sometimes good, even if at least one gives a good answer to every question when multiple are queried Products being evaluated: ChatGPT, Grok, Gemini, Perplexity (free tier only) Update 2026-08-06 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Behavior where an AI is "knowingly, competently deceiving" the user counts as "being dumb" for the purposes of this market.
The probability rose 10.5 percentage points over the last 24 hours (42.0% → 52.5%).
No verified catalyst has been linked to this move yet. ProbCast does not attribute moves to news without evidence connecting the timing of a specific report to the repricing.
The contract must resolve based on what has happened by this date.
Derived from the contract's own mechanics as of Oct 18, 9:53 AM ET. ProbCast does not list scheduled meetings, announcements, or data releases it cannot verify.
Research signals — these models are still accumulating the history needed for full validation, and they can disagree with the headline read. Model confidence: low · expected error ±30 pts.
The price is actively repricing on real volume. The number is still moving — don't treat the latest print as settled consensus yet.
Read the latest price with caution; conditions make it an unreliable summary right now.
Short-term motion of the price line (~1h), distinct from the environment above — not a prediction of the final outcome.
Secondary read: leaning toward Thin market.
A read-only classification of the market environment — how much weight the current price deserves as a read of consensus. It describes conditions, never a trade.