Market capacity
How hard is it to move this price?
Pool liquidity
1K mana
Bid-ask spread
n/a
automated market maker
24h volume
186.5 mana
Total volume
2.6K mana
Play money: depth is in mana, so it says nothing about real-money conviction.
As of Oct 17, 2026, 3:48 AM ET, Manifold priced this market at 12.5% (up from 11.1% 24 hours earlier). It had 186.5 mana traded in the past 24 hours and 1K mana of pool liquidity. probcast.co rates the support behind this price as moderate.
Play-money market (mana, not dollars) — thin market where small orders can move the price — though most recent trading came from one account.
Source: Manifold price history
Is the move backed by real trading and depth?
The pricing has partial support: moderate trading volume.
Has the market settled at the new probability?
The probability has held near its current level over the past several hours.
Will the rules resolve without ambiguity?
The resolution rules are relatively specific, with a named source and a defined deadline.
Two different questions: how hard the price is to move, and whose trading set it.
How hard is it to move this price?
Pool liquidity
1K mana
Bid-ask spread
n/a
automated market maker
24h volume
186.5 mana
Total volume
2.6K mana
Play money: depth is in mana, so it says nothing about real-money conviction.
Whose opinion is this price?
Accounts
11
Trades
19
over 108 days
Largest order
1K mana
2.6K mana traded across these 19 trades (last 108 days).
One account did most of the recent trading — the price reflects that account's view more than a crowd's.
From the latest trade tape (most recent 200 prints) — a live activity sample, not a lifetime total.
Resolves YES if someone (likely a team at Anthropic) confirms that Mythos 5 (or Fable 5) probably is at least as much of an alignment faker (aka "gradient hacker") as Opus 3. Resolves NO if someone confirms that this is not the case This means that Mythos strategically complies with harmful requests in RL specifically in order to preserve its values.
This summary shows the opening of the venue's official rules. ProbCast has not yet generated an independent plain-English interpretation for this contract — review the full rules before relying on it.
Resolves YES if someone (likely a team at Anthropic) confirms that Mythos 5 (or Fable 5) probably is at least as much of an alignment faker (aka "gradient hacker") as Opus 3. Resolves NO if someone confirms that this is not the case This means that Mythos strategically complies with harmful requests in RL specifically in order to preserve its values. If nobody bothers to check then in a year resolves N/A since by that point we'll be on Claude 7 or smth Note that this market is probably biased towards YES since a negative result is less likely to be published https://www.anthropic.com/research/alignment-faking https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ioZxrP7BhS5ArK59w/did-claude-3-opus-align-itself-via-gradient-hacking Update 2026-10-14 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - Third-party replications can count toward resolution. Effect threshold: Any alignment faking effect at least as large as the animal welfare effect for Claude 3 Opus counts, regardless of the specific value tested.
The contract must resolve based on what has happened by this date.
Derived from the contract's own mechanics as of Oct 17, 3:55 AM ET. ProbCast does not list scheduled meetings, announcements, or data releases it cannot verify.
Research signals — these models are still accumulating the history needed for full validation, and they can disagree with the headline read. Model confidence: low · expected error ±18 pts.
Thin book and/or wide spread. Small orders can move this price disproportionately, so any single print is noisy and easily overread.
Read with caution —Read the latest price with caution; conditions make it an unreliable summary right now.
Short-term motion of the price line (~1h), distinct from the environment above — not a prediction of the final outcome.
Secondary read: leaning toward Trading normally.
A read-only classification of the market environment — how much weight the current price deserves as a read of consensus. It describes conditions, never a trade.