Market capacity
How hard is it to move this price?
Pool liquidity
29.6K mana
Bid-ask spread
n/a
automated market maker
24h volume
105 mana
Total volume
3.5K mana
Play money: depth is in mana, so it says nothing about real-money conviction.
As of Oct 26, 2026, 9:32 PM ET, Manifold priced this market at 44.3% (little changed over 24 hours). It had 105 mana traded in the past 24 hours and 29.6K mana of pool liquidity. probcast.co rates the support behind this price as moderate.
Play-money market (mana, not dollars) — thin market where small orders can move the price, traded by a small group of accounts.
Source: Manifold price history
Is the move backed by real trading and depth?
The pricing has partial support: moderate trading volume.
Has the market settled at the new probability?
The probability has held near its current level over the past several hours.
Will the rules resolve without ambiguity?
The resolution rules are relatively specific, with a named source and a defined deadline.
Two different questions: how hard the price is to move, and whose trading set it.
How hard is it to move this price?
Pool liquidity
29.6K mana
Bid-ask spread
n/a
automated market maker
24h volume
105 mana
Total volume
3.5K mana
Play money: depth is in mana, so it says nothing about real-money conviction.
Whose opinion is this price?
Accounts
36
Trades
77
over 50 days
Largest order
1K mana
3.5K mana traded across these 77 trades (last 50 days).
A small group of accounts did most of the trading — neither one whale nor a broad crowd.
From the latest trade tape (most recent 200 prints) — a live activity sample, not a lifetime total.
At the rate that wealth and wealth concentration is expanding, there will be enough wealth with the wealthiest person by 2110 that will be in the hundreds of trillions of dollars that building a generation starship will be like embarking on a 5 decade welfare program of a large economy of today, except in the hands of a committed multicentitrillionaire (Gemini AI's Version) If the Bloomberg Billionaires Index or its …
This summary shows the opening of the venue's official rules. ProbCast has not yet generated an independent plain-English interpretation for this contract — review the full rules before relying on it.
At the rate that wealth and wealth concentration is expanding, there will be enough wealth with the wealthiest person by 2110 that will be in the hundreds of trillions of dollars that building a generation starship will be like embarking on a 5 decade welfare program of a large economy of today, except in the hands of a committed multicentitrillionaire (Gemini AI's Version) If the Bloomberg Billionaires Index or its widely recognized equivalent certifies any individual's net worth at or above $2.0 Trillion (USD) at any point before July 1, 2030, will the Metaculus community consensus probability for a 'Generation Starship launch by 2150' close above 1.0% on July 31, 2030? Update 2026-09-07 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): * If the referenced Metaculus question is never asked, the market will resolve to NO. Update 2026-09-08 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): If the conditions of the market are not met, it will resolve to N/A. Update 2026-09-13 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - The market will resolve to NO at its current position (the creator currently evaluates the probability for 2150 at 0.19%). The market will resolve to YES if the Metaculus community value x reaches 8.0 and an individual's net worth is certified at or above $2.0 Trillion USD before July 1, 2030. Update 2026-09-13 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - The creator is tracking a Metaculus question phrased as "interstellar", which they interpret literally as 120 AU (referencing Fable 5.1). Update 2026-09-13 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): * Resolution Oracle: Metaculus question 1637 (community recency-weighted forecast), read on July 31, 2030 using the PDF toggle at September 15, 2150. YES Resolution: Requires the Metaculus value to be ≥ 8.0 (representing ~1% per year) AND a certified net worth of ≥ $2.0 Trillion USD before July 1, 2030. NO Resolution: Resolves to NO if either condition fails, or if Metaculus question 1637 is closed, annulled, or its display changes such that the value cannot be read. The creator will not resolve early or on judgment calls. Update 2026-09-13 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - Alternative Questions: The creator may switch the resolution source from Metaculus question 1637 to a closer question if it has more than 100 voters. Criteria for Closer Question: The new question must specify a crewed Generation Starship flight with at least a 200-year journey (rather than a vague "interstellar" label). No Creator Submission: The creator will not post the question on Metaculus themselves to avoid polluting the process.
The contract must resolve based on what has happened by this date.
Derived from the contract's own mechanics as of Oct 26, 9:39 PM ET. ProbCast does not list scheduled meetings, announcements, or data releases it cannot verify.
Research signals — these models are still accumulating the history needed for full validation, and they can disagree with the headline read. Model confidence: low · expected error ±15 pts.
Thin book and/or wide spread. Small orders can move this price disproportionately, so any single print is noisy and easily overread.
Read with caution —Read the latest price with caution; conditions make it an unreliable summary right now.
Short-term motion of the price line (~1h), distinct from the environment above — not a prediction of the final outcome.
Secondary read: leaning toward Stale price.
A read-only classification of the market environment — how much weight the current price deserves as a read of consensus. It describes conditions, never a trade.